analysis paper: Relational development: An analysis of diversity.
Briefly describe the need to validate the result of any research study
Is it important for a study to have high internal validity? What if Drew’s students had to take the exam during a time when construction was going on outside the window? What if there is suspicion of cheating on the part of a number of John’s students? Use the concepts of internal validity and discuss the problems with John’s claim.
Consider the same concept for external validity. What conditions must be met inside the college to be able to have high external validity? What are the advantages of conducting experiments in a laboratory (box-like environment)?
If John were to use this information to support his teaching strategies in a publication, would this be an example of accurate reporting of information? Why or why not?
need to make sure ecerything is in APA formatting as well as references.
The primary advantage of validating a research process is that it helps ensure that the conclusions drawn can be appropriately applied in policy development. For instance, John already made the conclusion that he is the better teacher at his department simply because the class performed better. Consequently, his conclusion infers that the teacher is the primary variable which influences student performance. A research validation process would help determine whether the case is actually true, or whether other factors contributed to the experienced outcome. Additionally, the process would determine the potential applicability of the research result in the larger school policy, noting that teacher input is extensively important,