adressing the social issue in the short story the yellow wallpaper

1000 words

work cited

ENC 1102 Literary Analysis Rubric (1)

You’ve already rated students with this rubric. Any major changes could affect their assessment results.

ENC 1102 Literary Analysis Rubric (1)

Criteria Ratings Pts
Edit criterion description Delete criterion row

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Focus 5983_4601

Range

threshold: pts

Edit rating Delete rating

25.0 to >20.0 pts
Mastering: Original thesis and main assertions offer and sustain an insightful analysis of textual observation(s)

5983_1619

Edit rating Delete rating

20.0 to >6.0 pts
Original thesis offers analytical insight but some of the paper’s main assertions rely on description, summary, or observation

5983_1985

Edit rating Delete rating

6.0 to >3.0 pts
Developing: Predictable thesis that offers observations of the assigned text(s); sustained exposition of select observations; analysis not present

5983_1697

Edit rating Delete rating

3.0 to >2.0 pts
Emerging: Predictable or absent thesis statement; unstained discussion of the main select observations

5983_6764

Edit rating Delete rating

2.0 to >0.0 pts
Absent thesis statement; brief, unsustained disucssion of very few observations about the text(s)

5983_4661

Edit rating Delete rating

0.0 to >0 pts
Does Not Meet Assignment Requirements

5983_8062

This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion.

pts

/ 25.0 pts

Additional Comments

Edit criterion description Delete criterion row

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Evidence 5983_6112

Range

threshold: pts

Edit rating Delete rating

30.0 to >16.0 pts
Mastering: Ample use of primary and secondary sources (accurate and related primary sources reinforce thesis and supporting points; secondary sources reinforce thesis and supporting points)

5983_9436

Edit rating Delete rating

16.0 to >12.0 pts
Consistent use of primary and secondary sources (accurate and related primary sources reinforce thesis and most supporting points; secondary sources reinforce thesis and most supporting points

5983_9425

Edit rating Delete rating

12.0 to >8.0 pts
Developing: Adequate use of primary and/or secondary source (accurate and related primary and/or secondary sources reinforce some points)

5983_9682

Edit rating Delete rating

8.0 to >4.0 pts
Inadequate (sporadic, inconsistent, unrelated, or inaccurate) use of primary or secondary sources

5983_7946

Edit rating Delete rating

4.0 to >0.0 pts
Emerging: Little to no use of primary or secondary sources

5983_8031

Edit rating Delete rating

0.0 to >0 pts
Does Not Meet Assignment Requirements

5983_7721

This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion.

pts

/ 30.0 pts

Additional Comments

Edit criterion description Delete criterion row

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Organization 5983_2054

Range

threshold: pts

Edit rating Delete rating

20.0 to >18.0 pts
Mastering: Logical sequencing of main assertions and supporting details, enhanced by consistent use of segues, transitions and topic sentences

5983_5734

Edit rating Delete rating

18.0 to >16.0 pts
Logical sequencing of main assertions and supporting details, usually facilitated by transitions and topic sentences

5983_7505

Edit rating Delete rating

16.0 to >15.0 pts
Developing: Logical sequencing of main assertions; lapses in transitions or topic sentences

5983_918

Edit rating Delete rating

15.0 to >14.0 pts
Illogical sequencing of most main assertions and/or supporting details

5983_5576

Edit rating Delete rating

14.0 to >0.0 pts
Emerging: No apparent sequencing of main assertions and/or supporting details

5983_8169

Edit rating Delete rating

0.0 to >0 pts
Does Not Meet Assignment Requirements

5983_1273

This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion.

pts

/ 20.0 pts

Additional Comments

Edit criterion description Delete criterion row

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Grammar and Mechanics 5983_5770

Range

threshold: pts

Edit rating Delete rating

15.0 to >8.0 pts
Mastering: Strong command of grammar and mechanics throughout; syntactical variety and sophistication

5983_8205

Edit rating Delete rating

8.0 to >5.0 pts
Correct grammar and mechanics throughout with few lapses; some syntactical variety and sophistication

5983_585

Edit rating Delete rating

5.0 to >3.0 pts
Developing: Adequate application of grammatical and mechanical rules; correct usage; some errors may be present but do not impede meaning

5983_4040

Edit rating Delete rating

3.0 to >2.0 pts
Serious errors in grammar and mechanics that sometimes inhibit meaning

5983_4590

Edit rating Delete rating

2.0 to >0.0 pts
Emerging: Severe errors in grammar and/or mechanics that frequently impede meaning

5983_6122

Edit rating Delete rating

0.0 to >0 pts
Does Not Meet Assignment Requirements

5983_1887

This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion.

pts

/ 15.0 pts

Additional Comments

Edit criterion description Delete criterion row

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Scholarly Style 5983_7999

Range

threshold: pts

Edit rating Delete rating

10.0 to >9.0 pts
Mastering: Consistent attention to document format; few, if any, errors in parenthetical citations and the Works Cited Page

blank

Edit rating Delete rating

9.0 to >8.0 pts
Adequate attention to document format; very few errors in parenthetical citations and the Works Cited Page

blank_2

Edit rating Delete rating

8.0 to >7.0 pts
Developing: Sufficient attention to document design; some lapses in formatting adherence

5983_2418

Edit rating Delete rating

7.0 to >6.0 pts
Little attention to document format; frequent errors in parenthetical citations and/or the Works Cited Page

5983_4420

Edit rating Delete rating

6.0 to >0.0 pts
Emerging: Little to no attention to document format; frequent errors in parenthetical citations and/or the Works Cited Page

5983_1388

Edit rating Delete rating

0.0 to >0 pts
Does Not Meet Assignment Requirements

5983_7769

This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion.

20180211175849gazal_enc1102

 

 

 

Solution Preview

Feminism in “The Yellow Wallpaper”
The Yellow Wallpaper is a short classical story about Gilman and her husband John, who keeps her locked up because of her anxiety and nervous condition. John diagnoses his wife as sick and believes that it would be better to have her kept inside the house, preventing her from nearly all activities. Some of the things that Gilman was prevented from doing include making decisions on her own, writing any kind of notes,

(1,067 words)

adressing the social issue in the short story the yellow wallpaper was last modified: by