You are the facility manager for EnVision

Question

You are the facility manager for EnVision, a high-tech vehicle maker located in Atlanta. This new company designs, manufactures, and sells electric vehicles and charging units. EnVision’s unique designs, technical prowess, and limited competition has placed them in the enviable position of having a high demand for their line of products. This demand has generated over a billion dollars in pre-sale orders, and a new manufacturing facility is required to meet customer’s needs. The firm’s CEO, Mark Hammel, has asked you to assist him in selecting a new site that will accommodate a new state-of-the-art facility.

Mr. Hammel has been busy preparing a presentation to the board of directors and investors regarding new facility needs and has shown you the first draft of his presentation. Some of his thoughts seem biased and his original mockup of the presentation outline looks to be missing many of the ideas of editorial thinking and communication that you know are necessary in the business world.

As a responsible manager, you realize that presentations need to be objective and unbiased. To adhere to these principles, you have decided to review other presentations and documents which were used to influence various audiences. While doing so, you need to note the language and content of each and determine the language most appropriate for editorial presentation. The following three presentations include the best opportunities for you to share your thoughts using examples for the CEO on improvement in his presentation:



Instructions

Prepare a memo to CEO, Mark Hammel that showcases examples of good and poor presentations, and address the following questions. Make appropriate recommendations for how to proceed with the presentation you are working on with Mr. Hammel in your explanations.

Review the three influential presentations provided and perform the following evaluations in your memo:

Do biases from the presentation material exist in these examples? What leads you to assume that biases are present?
Evaluate the presentation materials and rank them according to their degree of objectivity and bias.
Provide suggestions for how each of the example presentations could be improved to increase objectivity and reduce bias.

Please note, I did this paper before and I make a little mistake, please see the feedback from the instructor.

Hello Odell — Please see the grading feedback below as aligned with the grading rubric for any concerns and highlights of positive momentum. Do reach out should you have questions.

Deliverable 04 – Component 1: Requirement: Describe and explain with clarity and thoroughness what contributes to good and poor presentations.

Score: 4 – Mastery

Rubric Feedback: Clear and thorough examples given of good and poor presentations.

Personalized Feedback: Congratulations! You demonstrated mastery with respect to offering basic examples of good and poor presentations. Your evaluation included an appropriate level of analysis regarding outlining different presentation attributes to observe as well as pitfalls to avoid when constructing presentations. Your results demonstrated critical thinking and a commitment to care in your writing.

Deliverable 04 – Component 2: Requirement: Provide clear and thorough recommendations to the CEO on how to proceed with the presentation being created.

Score: 4 – Mastery

Rubric Feedback: Clear and thorough recommendations were made to the CEO on how to proceed with the presentation being created.

Personalized Feedback: Congratulations! You demonstrated mastery with respect to making basic recommendations to the CEO on how to proceed with the presentation being created. Your evaluation included an appropriate level of analysis of your research findings evaluating the techniques you examined to formulate recommendations to the CEO about how to proceed with creating presentations. Your analysis was thorough, was supported with convincing evidence, and resulted in logical conclusions.

Deliverable 04 – Component 3: Requirement: Clearly and thoroughly address whether biases exist in the sample presentations, including what leads to the assumption that biases are present.

Score: 1 – No Pass

Rubric Feedback: Inadequate addressing of biases exists in the sample presentations, including what leads to the assumption that biases are present.

Personalized Feedback: Please consider this deliverable requirement again as this deliverable requirement was not present or was lacking meaningful substance in your submission. I invite you to carefully review all deliverable requirements to ensure that you include all necessary analyses to maximize your learning. A recommended strategy is to follow the grading rubric precisely to ensure that you have met all deliverable requirements to avoid having to revise your work and to maximize your efforts and learning on each submission. Perform research as needed, and be sure to cite your sources in your deliverable submission.

Please review this as the Jobs presentation is loaded with bias. One presentation wasn’t discussed.

Deliverable 04 – Component 4: Requirement: Clearly and thoroughly evaluate the presentation materials, including ranking in order of degree of objectivity and bias.

Score: 1 – No Pass

Rubric Feedback: No evaluation of the presentation materials, including ranking in order of degree of objectivity and bias.

Personalized Feedback: Please consider this deliverable requirement again as this deliverable requirement was not present or was lacking meaningful substance in your submission. I invite you to carefully review all deliverable requirements to ensure that you include all necessary analyses to maximize your learning. A recommended strategy is to follow the grading rubric precisely to ensure that you have met all deliverable requirements to avoid having to revise your work and to maximize your efforts and learning on each submission. Perform research as needed, and be sure to cite your sources in your deliverable submission.

As with the prior requirement, please reconsider this requirement and the objectivity and bias in each presentation.

Deliverable 04 – Component 5: Requirement: Clearly and thoroughly detailed suggestions for how each of the sample presentations could be improved to increase objectivity and reduce bias.

Score: 1 – No Pass

Rubric Feedback: Minimal suggestions for how each of the sample presentations could be improved to increase objectivity and reduce bias.

Personalized Feedback: Please consider this deliverable requirement again as this deliverable requirement was not present or was considerably inadequate in your submission. I invite you to carefully review all deliverable requirements to ensure that you include all necessary analyses to maximize your learning. A recommended strategy is to follow the grading rubric precisely to ensure that you have met all deliverable requirements to avoid having to revise your work and to maximize your efforts and learning on each submission. Perform research as needed, and be sure to cite your sources in your deliverable submission.

This requirement is dependent on the adequate completion of the prior two requirements. Please evaluate and reconsider after revising the responses to the prior two requirements.

============================

Overall: Odell — Please spend more time evaluating the objectivity and bias in the presentations. A more critical evaluation will help you complete the requirements in a more substantial manner.

Please review, revise, and resubmit when ready. Go for it, you can do this! : )

Image preview for”this new company designs, manufactures, and sells electric vehicles and charging units.”

This new company design manufactures and sells electric vehicles and charging units.

APA

1555 words

Click the purchase button to get full answer.

This new company designs, manufactures, and sells electric vehicles and charging units. was last modified: by