Discuss the reasoning for your choice of jurisdiction of the court in each case.
Discussion Post – Part 1 and Part 2
“The Jurisdiction of the Courts” Please respond to the following:
Part 1: From the e-Activity (in attachment), propose at least three (3) rules that you would use in order to choose the more appropriate court (state or federal) for the hearing of a particular case. Discuss the reasoning for your choice of jurisdiction of the court in each case. Provide two (2) examples of jurisdiction choice to support your rationale.
Describe the manner in which presiding judges use the principle of judicial self-restraint within their U.S. courtroom procedures. Provide two (2) examples where judicial self-restraint is in use to support your rationale.
Part 2: Respond to the post of a peer
Post of a peer (below):
Hi,Class and Prof
Three rules that I might use are
1.Geographic Location
2.The difference within the statutes of limitations
3. sorts of judges and juries
One example is, say there’s a business owner from any that files a breach of contract suit against another business owner in California for failing to perform on the contract, the failure of this performance caused $500,000 in damages. Another example would be if you file a lawsuit alleging that a competing company has made a product that you simply claim may be a violation against a patent that you wear that product. Patents are a creation of federal law. jurisdiction put simply, maybe a fancy word that encompasses a court’s power or authority to listen to a case. Both federal and state laws, also because of the constitutions of us and every single state, have rules concerning the facility of federal and state courts to listen to cases. These laws and constitutions also limit those courts’ power to listen to cases.
Jurisdiction is vital because if a court doesn’t have jurisdiction over a case, it doesn’t have the legal authority to pass judgment on the case. so as for a court to form a binding judgment on a case, it must have both material jurisdiction (the power to listen to the sort of case) also as personal jurisdiction (the power over the parties to the case).
additionally, attorneys will check out the difference in statutes of limitations. If a plaintiff has missed a filing deadline in state court, the case is going to be filed in court goodbye because the statute of limitations is longer there. this may only be the case for federal question cases, however, because the court must use the state court’s statute of limitations for all cases brought under diversity jurisdiction.
In addition, lawyers and attorneys are most frequently all right versed within the different types of judges and juries which will be found in state and federal courts. Oftentimes, attorneys might imagine those federal judges could also be more forgiving of a plaintiff than a state court judge, or vice-versa. Jury panels also can differ in their views dramatically based upon whether it’s a state or court. this happens because federal jury panels are selected from a way wider geographical area than are state court jury panels.
Image preview for discuss the reasoning for your choice of jurisdiction of the court in each case.
APA
455 words