Should we accord human rights to AI?

Source-Based Paper Assignment

Style MLA
Number of words 1509
Number of sources 0
Spacing Double
PowerPoint slides 0

Source-BasedPaper Assignment

Instructions: We have just finished reading and considering All Systems Red, by Martha Wells, a science fiction novella that raises important questions about who counts as human, and how broadly we should assign human rights.For this assignment, I would like you to write a 5 page double-spaced paper (that is, a paper that is at least 5full double-spaced pages) that engages with these questions, drawing on some of the 10 sources in the Sources folder on Blackboard under Content and possibly (if you so choose) on All Systems Red as well.
For this paper, I want you to use the sources provided and your own thoughts to consider the question of how broadly we ought to expand human rights to include entities not currently considered human. For this you might consider things like how we ought to treat AI or animals, the way we have in the past treated oppressed groups as if they were non-human, what rights should be human rights available to all, etc. To be very clear: please do not try to make the case in this essay that any group of humans should not be accorded human rights. Instead, please consider the expansion of human rights to other groups. Should we accord human rights to AI? To animals? To robots? Or is there something unique about humans that means we should keep human rights for humans only?


Category Satisfactory Unsatisfactory
Clarity of Thesis
It is easy to determine what you are arguing and why It is difficult to discern your argument, or difficult to read the thesis
Responsiveness to Prompt Your thesis clearly answers the question in the prompt It is difficult to tell how your thesis is an answer to the prompt, or it does not answer the prompt
Argumentativeness Your thesis is arguable and non-obvious: someone could disagree with you in a reasoned manner. Your thesis is a fact, or has no discernible structure
Connection between Thesis and Conclusion
Your thesis and argument remain the same throughout the paper There is a noticeable difference between your thesis at the beginning and end of the paper, or there is no return to the thesis at the end of the paper
Connection between Thesis and Evidence Your thesis and evidence are clearly related in a manner that the reader can follow You present evidence without connecting it to the thesis, or you connect your evidence to an argument that is not the same as the thesis you present
Contextualization of Evidence Your evidence is presented alongside context and analysis that allows the reader to make the most of it Your evidence is presented without context, without analysis, or with context or analysis that does not permit the reader to understand what the evidence is doing for your paper
Accuracy of Evidence Your evidence accurately reflects what is going on in the sources. Your evidence does not appear to be connected to what goes on in the sources.
Efficiency of Quotes You quote only the selection you need from the sources to support the thesis. You quote large chunks from the sources without explaining why you need such a large selection.
Intelligibility of Expression It is easy to determine what you are saying with generally acceptable grammar, spelling, and related elements It is difficult at times to understand what you are saying due to issues with grammar, spelling, or related elements
Citation Your evidence (both quotes and summary) is clearly cited using largely correct MLA style. Your evidence is either not cited or you have not used MLA style correctly.
Choice of Sources The sources you have used clearly relate to the point you are trying to make. The sources you have chosen do not seem to relate to the topic on which you are writing.
Accuracy of Bibliography You have included a bibliography for all sources you used, and the bibliographic entries are largely correct. You have omitted a bibliography or your entries are mostly incorrect.
Integration of Quotes Your quotes are properly sandwiched with context and analysis, and do not stand in a sentence of their own. Your quotes are not contextualized, not analyzed, or are alone in their sentence.

Image preview for”should we accord human rights to AI?”

Should we accord human rights to AI

Click the purchase button to get full answer.


Open chat
Contact us here via WhatsApp