I have 5 page “Pro” essay about one of Martin Luther King philosophical points.
I have an outline of the topic that I need you to write on, and I have an example and how to write it from the book.
I also have the format of the essay.
Here is the format of the essay that I want you to follow.
You can read it and get an idea of what the essay would be look like.
Here is the topic that I need you to pick two that you think that you can write about the most.
The one that underline at the end of the page is the conclusion.
Here is the book:
https://www.taylorfrancis.com/
You can read chapter 2 there is an example there. From page 15-22
Here is the most important part from the book.
The last two part of the essay going to be:
There will be Theoretical observation (this is a broad theoretical groundwork upon which the whole argument rests) on the essay which going to be one page you might compare it with Socrates why it is different philosophical point. Why would he do the opposite thing.
Also you have to connected to the world today. Significance (this is a concrete example from the world in which these issues play out today).
For example you might consider the Arab Spring.
Introduction
The author {Martin Luther Jr.} argues for the following controversial conclusion, a just law i in sync with the law of God (moral law). He supports this premise with the following premises: (a) only the law of God (moral law), ought to be obeyed and (b) unjust law is neither natural nor eternally rooted. This essay will examine each premise in the light of objectors and then defend the author from these objections.
Possible objections to the first premises
Martin Luther, a pious and dedicated man of God, believed that only by obedience to the moral laws and the laws of God could a stable and just society be realized. He saw in God an ultimate, just and reliable Source that man could derive from.