Indigenous crown representatives
Standard debate length. One point, second point, buttress, rebuttal and concluding argument. I’m arguing that Indigenous crown representatives is a meaningful colonization.
Be it resolved that the following topics are examples of meaningful decolonization:
- Section 35
- Apologies (ex. State or Papal)
- Abolishing the Indian Act
- Required Learning (ex. Umanitoba faculty of arts Indigenous content requirement)
- Revisiting History (ex. Renaming institutions, roads or monuments)
- Indigenous crown representatives (ex. GG or LG)
- UNDRIP
- Implementation of UNDRIP by Canadian government
Please give professor a copy of debate notes or presentation
Answer Preview
