Philosophy discussion

Question

You have to read the article I sent you in the materials (Link: https://www.npr.org/sections/coronavirus-live-updates/2020/10/10/922398246/a-coronavirus-vaccine-could-kill-half-a-million-sharks-conservationists-warn?utm_medium=social&utm_source=facebook.com&utm_campaign=npr&utm_term=nprnews&fbclid=IwAR2LTzkJYewxMf70dsEldi5vthd9AmRsJK5bHl_JGLf4WkTDLGv-SoKjdbw&fbclid=IwAR1SO7oMkA7WyWBGvBGfnB1_5ZM0pWLXbUrIejKfCu-U5qOLKoWvGaBEt1o&fbclid=IwAR2PDAcFMrGcYLn9eK2jwAlQbOu48gcSCdqhZJMWOt6DZCaFtCuwLBwILsY) and write this. Here’s the prompt:

We are obviously in the midst of a very serious and deadly pandemic. But if this particular vaccine works, a massive number of Sharks will die for it. Is saving human lives and reducing human suffering worth the death of so many endangered animals? Why or why not?

Image preview for “we are obviously in the midst of a very serious and deadly pandemic.”

Click the purchase button to get full answer.