Thomas Kuhn and Karl Popper
Prompt: Briefly describe the ways Popper and Kuhn, think that scientific knowledge changes. What, if anything, do they agree about? How do they differ? What image of 20th-century science do they offer us? *Hint: they both agreed that there was such a thing as “normal science“. Use your arguments and provide adequate evidence and reasoning as to what you stated.
Requirements: Has to be at least 2000 words and MLA format. Please do not use any outside sources and only use the sources provided. There should be plenty of sources that I provided along with the two books from Kuhn and Bowler/Morus. Good Luck!
Answer Preview
